Essay --

The meaning of happening theory is one thing depends on other things. An effectiveness of a leader must be salubrious fix between its direction and behavior and the condition of the situation. A lead style work in one situation might not necessary work in other situation. In misfortune theory, lead style describe as task-oriented or relationship-oriented. A relationship-oriented leader open up respect, mutual sureness and listen to employees needs. A task-oriented leader is motivated by task accomplishment. Next, task-oriented provide clear directions and set performance standards. The theory provides efficaciously matching the leader and situation. The most important elements to contingencies be the situation and followers. In contingency approach its surrounding with leader, followers and situation. The three important factors of contingency approach be leader member relations, position force play and task structure. Task, structure, context, and environment are im portant to leaders style. Fiedlers contingency model, situational theory, grade- terminus theory and Vroom-Jago contingency model genuine the contingency model by Fiedler and his associates. The Fiedlers contingency model was design to diagnose leaders style and situation in organization. The principle of this model is In Fiedlers contingency model styles is task-oriented or relationship-oriented. To measure leader styles, Fielders developed the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. When leaders who score high on this scale, which are relationship oriented and those who score low on this scale are describe as task oriented. A task-oriented leader builds respect, mutual trust and listens to employees needs. A relationship-ori... ...riented leadership and participative leadership (House & Mitchell, 1974, p. 83). Path goal theory attempts to combine the motivation principles become a theory of leadership. This makes street-goal theory incomparable because no other leadership appro aches deal with this way. The other strength of path goal theory that is leaders clarifies the paths to the goals and fosters remove any difficulties for the subordinates. The disadvantage that is path goal theory has not examined the basic motivational assumptions of the theory. Next, most leadership scholars agree that path-goal theory has not been adequately tested (Thomas, P. D. G. 1971). Path goal does not describe how a leader could use different styles to help subordinates feel assured of success. For example, path-goal theory does not explain how directive leadership increase subordinate motivation during ambiguous task.