Female Entrepreneurship in comparison with male entrepreneurs Coursework

Fe antheral Entrepreneurship in comparison with male entrepreneurs - Coursework ExampleIt a psychologicall(a)y belief that their efforts are considered to be untrained and inexpert in comparison to their counterparts. Various researches on entrepreneurship relate to male distinctiveness and focused mainly onto male-dominant area. a few(prenominal) studies considered the female individuality of entrepreneurship with their related actions. Wo men always had to disgorge some extra effort in target to succeed in putting up a business and then maintaining it in a male dominated working environment. Therefore, women had to gain extra as stripes through separate connections and networking. Mainly women who belong to subordinate classes charter major support from their families and friends and the tie ups they make in between through negotiations, in order to set up and maintain a business. Whereas, women from high class families or from middle class families, could independently ope n up their business through contacts with their colleagues or with the members of the chamber and association. Moreover, there can be a personal aspiration or drive to set up a business of its own or else some other external reasons like the fight to survive, where women believe on their social contacts and networks and utilize it completely to shape up their business entity. II. Female entrepreneurship in comparison with male entrepreneurship Various studies have reflected that female and male entrepreneurs transfigure in respect of their production outcomes the motivations they get to start up a business the effort they put up for the progress of their business entity the extent of their business start-ups the sort of business they want to start the executing potential they expect to have for their set up their preference for any project risk the proficiency they apply to identify various business opportunities the assurance they have in their efforts for start-up and the conse quences that they need to face (Brush, 1992 Carter et al., 1997 Srinivasan, et al., 1993 Boden, 2000 office of Advocacy, 2006 Robb and Wolken 2002 ). II. 1. Performance of firms Studies have highlighted that the presentation of new projects led by females lag behind to that led by males. For ventures led by females, factors like sales growth, employment growth, compensation and venture endurance are all considered to be low. (Boden, 2000 Office of Advocacy, 2006 Robb and Wolken 2002 Srinivasan, et al., 1993). The firms owned by women have inferior sales margin and hence could satisfy lesser people in their business than that of men-owned enterprises (Fischer et al., 1993). For example, in 2002 the firms owned by females generated about 87585 dollar sales and had employed about 7.79 people in comparison to 12.04 employees and 1862159 dollar sales for those led by men (Office of Advocacy, 2006). Women-owned firms also gained less income than that by men. They generate an average of and 78% of the profit in a similar business led by men. (Robb and Wolken, 2002). Furthermore, 46% of freelanced women earn less than 15000 dollar in 1998, whereas only 21% of freelanced men earned this amount. On the contrary, 16% of freelanced men earned higher than 95,000 dollar, in comparison to 4% of women (Office of Advocacy, 2001). New projects led by women have little chance to survive eventually than the